∆ contended that it was in response to a user's statement:
"you cant literally ban yourself so that why i said 'by leaving'. you can cease the bait im better than that </3"
The prosecution argued that such was in response to a joke, was clearly baseless, and needlessly escalated the situation.
For the second charge, the accused replied “@SDBI Ticket them I’m offended” to a user saying what amounts to a common puerile “yo mama” joke: “I mean your mom is certainly more”.
Court finds its reasoning highly relevant and persuasive.
Preamble of Art. 22a states that part of its purpose was to stop needless pinging.
While perhaps pinging one or a limited number of officers may not constitute a “mass summon”, pinging the SDBI role does indeed summon the entire SDBI en masse.
It is settled that the accused mass summoned the SDBI.
The mass summonings of the SDBI occurred entirely in situations manifestly without merit, where the context is blatantly nonserious and untethered to any conceivably criminal conduct.
Considering ∆'s legal expertise, court found that there was plenty.
Judgment: Convicted and sentenced to a mute of 24 hours.