ConLaw Outline

Civil & Economic Liberties

Civil Rights Defined

Incorporation (pp. 447–448, 458–474)

Adamson v. California

Incorporation (pp. 447–448, 458–474)

McDonald v. City of Chicago

Palko v. Connecticut

Ramos v. Louisiana

Timbs v. Indiana

State Action Doctrine (pp. 474–491)

Entanglement Exception (pp. 474–491)

Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.

Foundations (pp. 474–491)

Civil Rights Cases

Foundations (pp. 474–491)

Public Functions Exception (pp. 474–491)

Evans v. Newton

Hudgens v. NLRB

Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck

Marsh v. Alabama

Public Functions Exception (pp. 474–491)

Terry v. Adams

State Action Doctrine (pp. 474–491)

Civil & Economic Liberties

Equal Protection

Discriminatory Purpose vs. Effect (pp. 657–676)

City of Mobile v. Bolden

Discriminatory Purpose vs. Effect (pp. 657–676)

McCleskey v. Kemp

Palmer v. Thompson

Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney

Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.

Washington v. Davis

Race and National Origin (pp. 634–657)

Historical Foundations (pp. 634–657)

Dred Scott v. Sandford

Historical Foundations (pp. 634–657)

Plessy v. Ferguson

School Desegregation (pp. 634–657)

Brown v. Board of Education

School Desegregation (pp. 634–657)

Strict Scrutiny (pp. 634–657)

Korematsu v. United States

Loving v. Virginia

Palmore v. Sidoti

Strict Scrutiny (pp. 634–657)

Race and National Origin (pp. 634–657)

Rational Basis (pp. 609–634)

City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center

NYC Transit Authority v. Beazer

Railway Express Agency v. New York

Rational Basis (pp. 609–634)

Romer v. Evans

USDA v. Moreno

Sex Discrimination (pp. 737–772)

Gender Stereotypes and Distinctions (pp. 752–772)

Califano v. Webster

Gender Stereotypes and Distinctions (pp. 752–772)

Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County

Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan

Nguyen v. INS

Orr v. Orr

Rostker v. Goldberg

Level of Scrutiny (pp. 737–752)

Craig v. Boren

Frontiero v. Richardson

Geduldig v. Aiello

Level of Scrutiny (pp. 737–752)

United States v. Virginia

Sex Discrimination (pp. 737–772)

Equal Protection

Federal Executive Power

Administrative Agencies

Legislative Veto Rule

INS v. Chadha (1983)

Legislative Veto Rule

Major Questions Doctrine (pp. 253–261)

Biden v. Nebraska

Major Questions Doctrine (pp. 253–261)

West Virginia v. EPA

Non-Delegation Doctrine

Administrative Agencies

Appointment and Removal Power (pp. 269–288; Supp. 91–95)

Appointment Powers

Lucia v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Morrison v. Olson (1988)

Recess Appointments

NLRB v. Noel Canning

Recess Appointments

Removal Powers

Bowsher v. Synar (1986)

Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2010)

Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935)

Kennedy Process

canvas

Kennedy v. Braidwood Management (2025)

Myers v. United States (1926)

Removal Powers

Seila Law LLC v. CFPB (2020)

Wiener v. United States (1958)

Appointment and Removal Power (pp. 269–288; Supp. 91–95)

Executive Privilege (pp. 229–242, 253–261)

Cheney v. United States

Executive Privilege (pp. 229–242, 253–261)

United States v. Nixon

Foreign Policy (pp. 288–305)

U.S. v. Curtiss-Wright (1934)

Zivotofsky v. Kerry (2015)

Immigration (pp. 336–340)

Trump v. Hawaii

Inherent Presidential Power (pp. 229–242)

Youngstown Sheet & Tube

Litigation Against the President

Civil Suits Against the President

Clinton v. Jones

Nixon v. Fitzgerald

Prosecuting the President

Trump v. United States

Subpoenaing the President

Trump v. Mazars

Trump v. Vance

Litigation Against the President

Suing the President for Injunctive Relief

Treaties & Executive Agreements

Dames & More v. Regan, Secretary of Treasury (1981)

Treaties & Executive Agreements

War Powers (pp. 305–329)

War Powers Regarding the War on Terror and Habeas Corpus

Boumediene Habeas Corpus Process

canvas

Boumediene v. Bush (2008)

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004)

War Powers Regarding the War on Terror and Habeas Corpus

Case Study—Iran

The War Powers Resolution, 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548

War Powers (pp. 305–329)

Federal Executive Power

Line Item Vetoes

Federal Judicial Power

Congressional Limits on Judicial Power (pp. 12–18)

Ex Parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506 (1869).

United States v. Klein, 80 U.S. 128 (1871).

Judicial Review (pp. 1–9)

Marbury v. Madison

Justiciability Doctrines

Advisory Opinions (pp. 18–34)

Nashville C. & St. L. Ry. v. Wallace, 288 U.S. 249 (1933).

Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211 (1995).

Mootness

Capable of Repetition Yet Evading Review

DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974).

Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814 (1969).

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

Class Action Exceptions

U.S. Parole Commission v. Geraghty, 445 U.S. 388 (1980).

Voluntary Cessation

Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, 528 U.S. 167 (2000).

Voluntary Cessation

Mootness

Political Question Doctrine (pp. 62–76)

Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).

Political Question Doctrine (pp. 62–76)

Ripeness (pp. 62–76)

303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, 143 S. Ct. 2298 (2023).

Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136 (1967).

Lake Carriers' Ass'n v. MacMullan, 406 U.S. 498 (1972).

Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 (1961)

Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases, 419 U.S. 102 (1974).

Ripeness (pp. 62–76)

Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus, 573 U.S. 149 (2014).

United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75 (1947).

Standing (pp. 18–34)

Allen v. Wright

Massachusetts v. EPA

Standing (pp. 18–34)

Justiciability Doctrines

Theories of Interpretation (pp. 10–12; Heller pp. 914–929)

D.C. v. Heller

Theories of Interpretation (pp. 10–12; Heller pp. 914–929)

U.S. Const. Art. III

Universal Injunctions (Supp. pp. 1–25)

Trump v. CASA

Universal Injunctions (Supp. pp. 1–25)

Federal Judicial Power

Federal Legislative Power

Commerce Power (pp. 129–181)

Civil Rights Era (pp. 143–157)

Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority

Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States

Hodel v. Indiana

Katzenbach v. McClung

Perez v. United State

Foundational Era (pp. 129–143)

Gibbons v. Ogden

Hammer v. Dagenhart

Lochner v. New York (1905).

Necessary and Proper Clause (pp. 99–111)

McCullough v. Maryland.

Necessary and Proper Clause (pp. 99–111)

New Deal Era (Expansive Commerce Power)

NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin

U.S. v. Darby Lumber Co

Wickard v. Filburn

Commerce Power (pp. 129–181)

Modern Limits (pp. 157–181)

Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001).

Dual sovereignty

Gonzales v. Raich

Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968).

Modern Limits (pp. 157–181)

Pierce County, WA v. Guillen

U.S. v. Lopez

U.S. v. Morrison

Post-Civil War Amendments (pp. 207–218)

City of Boerne v. Flores

Post-Civil War Amendments (pp. 207–218)

Shelby County v. Holder

Taxing and Spending Power (pp. 201–207 + Learning Resources Canvas)

Chas C. Steward Co. v. Davis (1937)

Learning Resources v. Trump

Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service Commission (1947)

Sabri v. U.S.

Sebelius

South Dakota v. Dole

Taxing and Spending Power (pp. 201–207 + Learning Resources Canvas)

U.S. v. Butler

Tenth Amendment & Anti-Commandeering (pp. 189–201)

Murphy v. NCAA (2018)

NY v. US (1992)

Printz v. United States (1997)

Reno v. Condon (2000)

Tenth Amendment & Anti-Commandeering (pp. 189–201)

Federal Legislative Power

State Sovereignty (pp. 143–157)

Fundamental Rights

DPC Analysis

SDP v. PDP Frameworks

United States v. Carolene Products Co.

Concept of Fundamental Rights

DPC Analysis

Framework for DPC Analysis

Procedural v. Substantive Due Process

Marriage & Family Autonomy (pp. 805–817)

Bowen v. Owens

Califano v. Jobst

Loving v. Virginia

Marriage & Family Autonomy (pp. 805–817)

Obergefell v. Hodges

United States v. Windsor

Zablocki v. Redhail

Reproductive Autonomy (pp. 834–844, 859–871)

Buck v. Bell

Carey v. Population Services International

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

Eisenstadt v. Baird

Griswold v. Connecticut

Planned Parenthood v. Casey

Reproductive Autonomy (pp. 834–844, 859–871)

Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson

Sexual Orientation & Activity (pp. 901–911)

Bowers v. Hardwick

Lawrence v. Texas

Sexual Orientation & Activity (pp. 901–911)

Fundamental Rights

ConLaw Reading List

Vault