United States v. Nixon

  • Generally, conversations between the President and his advisors are privileged.
    • Policy justification: we want the President to speak freely with advisors.
  • This general privilege does not provide blanket immunity from complying with a subpoena in criminal proceedings.
    • Doing so would impede the judiciary from administering justice in criminal prosecutions.
  • The need for criminal justice outweighs the need for executive privilege.
    • The President's broad interest in confidentiality is not hindered by compliance with criminal subpoenas.
  • Any breach of confidentiality must have a nexus to the President's constitutional powers.
  • Exception: a need to protect military or diplomatic secrets or other confidential secrets.